Hew
to have been satisfactenly met,
" though there existed strong forimer facies grounds for bringing it."
6. Mr May Rays
in his evidened,
evidmed (p. 17)
en.
lot 206
that "to his certain knowledge " at one time owned. by alls Caldwell, then
{ {{ { 2 }
Livr
three Brothers." The Commission
having repartia " charge 18" as not presen, Mr Day Anoludes that they must have Mur-Day
one)
- disbelieved› altogether this positive Evidence "' of all ethay ", New by "charge 15", Mur "Caldwell is charger "with having : ounce three unlicensed Hongthing brothels " at a timer. It is seavily successary point out that the evidence).
May.
to
Ed on
reflected
have been perfectly brewer, that's
houses, standing, on land at one time,
434
Oconed, by Mr. Caldwell (the houses themselves bring possibly on lease to other parties.) may (perhaps at some
other time, ) have been used as Brothels; and yet that the
رکھے
" charge may be perfectly fatue. tehereas att that the
Commission reports is that it has not been proved :
6 . The assertion of Mr. May's, that the...
" destruction of the Memoranda and
4 And
papers of allah chow.
wong.
of the Books
removed the
- posibility of proving the concluding part of " charge 11' appears next to have: astonishia My
Mesoure."
"Day" "beyond of "charge: 11" is as
The Concluding park
~ follows. "that there were
"Entries in Au- chow Wong's books,
by him, of
And mode
paid to Mr. Caldwell on accant
"monies paid
" or out of the produce of plunder.
Now the second
Secondary
Made at sea)"
evidence of the Contents
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.